ietf-corpus

rfc-6423

Using the Generic Associated Channel Label for Pseudowire in the MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP)

H. Li, L. Martini, J. He, F. Huang
date2011-11 streamIETF areartg wgpwe3 statusPROPOSED STANDARD pages5 canonicalhttps://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6423 doi10.17487/RFC6423
This document describes the requirements for using the Generic Associated Channel Label (GAL) in pseudowires (PWs) in MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) networks, and provides an update to the description of GAL usage in RFC 5586 by removing the restriction that is imposed on using GAL for PWs, especially in MPLS-TP environments. [STANDARDS-TRACK]

updates

Extracted elements (6)

design-rationale §3

RFC 5586 prohibited GAL use with MPLS-TP PWs while allowing it for MPLS PWs, creating an inconsistency. This inconsistency caused unnecessary implementation differences and conflicted with MPLS-TP interoperability requirements (RFC 5654), motivating the removal of the restriction.

mpls, vpn

interoperability-note §3

MPLS-TP mechanisms must interoperate with existing IETF MPLS (RFC 3031) and PWE3 (RFC 3985) architectures. The prior RFC 5586 restriction on GAL usage with MPLS-TP PWs was inconsistent with this interoperability requirement.

mpls, vpn

normative-requirement §3 MAY

In MPLS-TP, the GAL MAY be used with PWs. This updates RFC 5586, which previously stated the GAL MUST NOT be used with PWs in MPLS-TP environments.

mpls, vpn

normative-requirement §3 MUST

In MPLS-TP, the GAL MUST be used with packets on a G-ACh on LSPs, Concatenated Segments of LSPs, and with Sections. This requirement is unchanged from RFC 5586.

mpls, vpn

protocol-element §3

The presence of a GAL in the label stack indicates that an ACH (Associated Channel Header) immediately follows the MPLS label stack. This invariant applies when GAL is used with PWs.

mpls, vpn

security-consideration §4

There are no further security considerations beyond those already specified in RFC 5586. The update to allow GAL with PWs in MPLS-TP does not introduce new security concerns.

security, mpls